Musings on the Random Walk

The easiest definition of the Random Walk is an analytic one. It doesn’t have anything related to probability theory, except insofar as the definition is motivated by probabilistic notions. To put it differently, probability theory will “lurk in the backdrop” from the beginning. However is a particular challenge in seeing how much you can go without introducing measure theory’s proper (and formidable) equipment which makes up the mathematical language. So we shall introduce measure theory (in section 3) only when faced by issues enough complicated that they might seem contrived if expressed as strictly analytic problems, i.e., as issues concerning the transition function which we’re going to define.

Note 1. It is also possible to analyze random walks in higher measurements. In each two measurements,
In the event the particle gets an identical chance for every single of the a simple random walk is symmetric
neighbors.
Here we is only going to examine
Easy random walks, mostly in a single measurement.
We’re thinking about answering the following questions:
— what’s the chance the particle will get to the stage a?
(The case a = 1 is commonly called “The monkey in the cliff”.)
– it continues to be side that is negative?
– it hasn’t been on the because step one on the positive side?
(“The Vote issue”)
The particle is willed by far away get in n measures?
When examining random walks, one may use several techniques that are general, such as
— conditioning, or using Uk proxies for specific British based samples.
2– the theory
— martingales,
But some specialized, such as
— counting courses,
— reflecting,
— time reversal.

This entry was posted in Probability theory, statistics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *